Comparison · 2026

AgencyKit vs Asana

Asana is mature project management for running team work. AgencyKit runs the client relationship, from proposal to paid. They solve different problems.

AgencyKit
VS
Asana
The short answer

Asana is best-in-class team project management, but it has no proposals, contracts, e-signature, invoicing, or online payments, and native time tracking only on its higher tiers. AgencyKit runs the entire client relationship end to end, so a client-facing business needs the latter, or Asana plus a stack of add-on tools.

AgencyKit vs Asana, at a glance

Asana pricing is per user, and native time tracking is limited to its Advanced tier and above.
FeatureAgencyKitAsana
Built forClient-to-cash workflowTeam project management
Client management (CRM)Client 360, every plan~Build-your-own
Proposals with online acceptOne-click client acceptNo proposals
Contracts + e-signatureE-signature on AgencyNo native e-sign
InvoicingEvery planNo invoicing
Online paymentsAgency planNo native payments
Built-in time trackingEvery plan~Advanced tier and up
Client portalAgency plan~Guest access only
Scheduling & meetingsAgency planTask calendar only
Team roles + permissionsAgency planPer user
Financial reports (P&L)P&L on Agency~Project dashboards
Pricing modelPer account (flat)Per user
Starting price$9/moFree / $10.99 user
Best forRunning client work end to endTeam project management

An honest look at both

No tool wins on everything. Here is where each one is genuinely the better pick.

Where Asana is the better choice

  • Mature, deep project management with List, Board, Timeline, and Calendar views, dependencies, forms, and proofing.
  • Strong program management at scale, with portfolios, goals, and workload planning across many projects.
  • Team collaboration for larger organizations, with a large integration ecosystem and enterprise admin.

Where AgencyKit pulls ahead

  • Native proposals, contracts with electronic signature, invoicing, and online payments, none of which Asana offers.
  • Built-in time tracking on every plan, rather than only on Asana's Advanced tier and above.
  • A branded client portal, rather than inviting clients as guests into your internal project tool.
  • Per-account pricing from $9 a month, rather than paying per user across the team.

Team project management, plus getting paid

 

Asana is excellent for coordinating team work: assigning tasks, mapping dependencies, and tracking many projects at once. What it does not do is the client-facing money side, so proposals, contracts, invoicing, and payments live in other tools. A common setup is Asana for internal delivery and AgencyKit for the client-to-cash workflow.

Frequently asked questions

AgencyKit vs Asana, answered.

You can manage the work on Asana, but not the client-to-cash side. Asana has no proposals, contracts, e-signature, invoicing, or online payments, so you would add separate tools for each. AgencyKit runs that workflow natively.

Only on its Advanced tier and above, and it is basic. Most teams add a tool like Toggl or Harvest. AgencyKit includes built-in time tracking on every plan, with hours flowing into invoices.

No. Asana has no native invoicing and cannot collect payments. AgencyKit includes invoicing on every plan and online payments on the Agency plan.

Many teams do. Run internal project and program management in Asana, and run proposals, contracts, invoices, and payments in AgencyKit.

Asana is billed per user, so cost scales with your team. AgencyKit is billed per account and starts at $9 a month, with the full Agency plan at $39, regardless of how many teammates are on that tier.

Keep comparing

 

See AgencyKit for yourself

Run one real client from proposal to paid invoice in a 14-day free trial. No card required. Plans start at $9 a month, billed per account.

Start your free trial